Sunday, August 27, 2017

When is enough ENOUGH?

It is the honey which makes us cruel enough
to ignore the death of a bee.

- Munia Khan, Author and Poet


Is anyone truly surprised?  I mean, really, are you surprised that 45 pardoned Sheriff Arpaio?  If so, why?  Was Charlottesville not enough to show you who 45 is?  Did you need to have him betray not only humanity (again) but the rule of law (again) with this latest travesty of a pardon to reveal his character, or, in truth, gaping lack thereof (again)?  Oh, the times they have a-changed....

I would like to think that it's not out of cynicism but a well-considered (re-)commitment to reality that has left me unfazed by this latest 'presidential' travesty.  (There's that word again; sorry, but it just fits....)  In fact, I assumed that it was only a matter of time, especially since 45's supposedly coy men allusion to the possibility at his previous travesty this week, the rally in Phoenix.

[Parenthetical reflection: in what has to be some kind of presidential 'record', 45 backed up a frighteningly unhinged rant in Phoenix - to a blessedly small crowd, thankfully - with a pardon of an unrepentant law breaker who's a skilled and committed racist, too.  And we thought Charlottesville was bad.  How many times in this presidency are we going to say, with horror, "What a week!?!"  Like, perhaps, every week?!?]

So now a supposed "law and order" president has pardoned its antithesis, a sheriff so racist, unlawful, inhumane and unrepentant that he was on the verge of being jailed for defying the very law that he was sworn to uphold.  The cravenness and inhumanity are stunning ... but par for the course.

I probably should spend some more time buttressing my argument with the facts about just how bad a person and government official the former sheriff is/was, but, frankly, I'm tired of the b.s.  He's just so abominable that I can't summon the energy to recount the horrors that prove why.  It's been done well by too many others too many times already....

What I can summon the energy to do is to explore the 'why' behind this latest presidential travesty and seek to help us figure out what to learn and anticipate from it.

Suffice it to say that I don't think that rewarding a loyal campaign supporter who also happens to be a fellow inhuman is the entire story behind this pardon.  In fact, I suspect that it's only a pretext.  Not to be too jaundiced, but I really think that this pardon is just the latest in what will prove to be a long series of "celebrations of the cynical" that will ultimately be the legacy of this presidency (and potentially our downfall as a country).

My suspicion is that 45 has a whole host of these morally callow and repugnant moves up his sleeve, in part because they reflect the utter callowness and repugnance of the man and in part because they're excellent political theater and strategy.  Think about it: what aren't we now focusing on because we're being distracted by this pardon inanity?

Certainly Russia.  Certainly 45's use of the Presidency to enrich himself personally.  Certainly his seeming glee in nominating (similarly[?]) stupifyingly unqualified candidates to key government posts.  Certainly his willingness to abide, condone and tacitly support the propagation of the myriad -isms that have plagued and continue to plague our beloved country.  Certainly his forfeiture of the role as the American president of being Leader of the Free World.

I could go on, but why bother?  It's clear that 45 is the most unqualified person ever to hold this office, both from a technical and personal standpoint.  Sure, we've had racist/xenophobic/etc. presidents before, but none so brazenly so now that we as a society supposedly condemn such inhumanity.  Sure, we've had incompetent presidents before, but none so determinedly so as to nominate non-scientists for influential science posts or sweatshop promoters for key labor posts or ... well, you get the picture....

What troubles me is that it's still unclear how low we'll allow 45 to take us before we revolt both figuratively and literally.  I remain amazed both at the fervence of his sheepish flock and at the seeming ambivalence of the 'moral majority' that appears willing to entertain its antithesis so long as its members are not affected directly and personally.  And I wonder just what it's going to take for us not just to resist - as, thankfully, many millions of us are beginning to do impactfully - but to bring down this order of the profane and deranged and replace it with a true government for the people by the people, a novel experiment to which we must return if we hope to salvage whatever can be made to remain of the American Dream.

What will it take for us to rise up together and shout in word and deed "ENOUGH!?!"  Not just enough of 45, but enough of the fraudulent, money-fueled system that produced him.  Not just enough of identity politics that mask the class war that's still being waged successfully centuries on in our history, but enough of the focus on the interests of the few over the many.  Not just enough of the combination of fake religion and fake patriotism in which too many of our fellows wrap themselves, but enough of the failure to respect and value our differences and uniqueness in addition to what we share.  Not just enough of lying to ourselves and the world about who we say we are, but enough of the failure to live up to our professed creeds that affirm us as equal beings gifted with unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

When will enough be ENOUGH, America?

I say that we start now....


I just wish that every responsible and concerned person would step back
regardless of race or gender and just take a closer look
at what's really going on in the world today
and say enough is enough.

 - Lonnie Earl Johnson, Convicted Murderer (Executed, 2007)


Sunday, August 13, 2017

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention....

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy
of this period of social transition
was not the strident clamor of the bad people,
but the appalling silence of the good people.

- The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story (1957)


Charlottesville.  I can't write.  I'm numb.  I can't write.  I'm deeply sad.  I can't write.  This is so wrong.  I can't write.  But this is America.  So I must write....

The time has come to choose sides: you are either for holding ourselves accountable for living up to our professed creeds - including that all people are created equal - or you are for favoring some over the others, which typically means the few over the many.  What is your choice?

We can no longer sit by and watch a president - small 'p' intended - alternatively encourage and absolve a group whose ideals are the antithesis of our republic's ... unless we want to admit that our ideals were never quite what we claimed them to be (or, to the point, in this modern era, we don't want them to be so).  There are no other options: the situation is binary ... just like the choice before all of us.

You must either stand on the side of humanity, diversity and inclusion or you must continue to defend our country's shameful legacy of inhumanity, supremacy and exclusion.  What is your choice?

A young woman died yesterday protesting the legacy of hate in our country, you know, the one that so many false patriots claim is the greatest and thus can't be criticized.  Actually, yesterday's tragedy proved the hollow falsity of this lie: if you can't criticize what happened yesterday - as our president didn't - then you really can't and don't care about our country.

Why?  It's quite simple really: what happens when it's your turn to be the hated?  I'm guessing that you'll want some special dispensation, the kind that you give to today's haters and withhold from their victims.  But as history shows, none will be forthcoming, especially, God forbid, if your 'side' loses.  Woe to you when the lessers rule....

I want to honor Heather Heyer, so I write ... slowly, painfully and partially numb, but I write.  I want to make hers the last such sacrifice on our torturous road to extending our constitutional rights to all.  I want to make ours a world that's so much better than we showed ourselves to be yesterday ... or, truth be told, any day in American history (with few notable exceptions).

What we saw yesterday is reality, not an aberration.  It's who we really are collectively: the far less noble denizens of a country that has sometimes subtly and often overtly encouraged the violent practice of -isms that, in the end, hurt us all.

We are not raised by racism, we are lowered by it.  We are not raised by sexism and misogyny, we are lowered by them.  We are not raised by ethnocentrism and xenophobia, we are lowered by them.  We are not raised by religiocentrism and religious bigotry, we are lowered by them.  We are not raised by gun-toting and violence, we are lowered by them.  We are not raised by classism and elitism, we are lowered by them.  Etc.

So, America, what is our choice?  Heather Heyer's legacy hinges thereon....

I love America more than any other country in this world,
and, exactly for this reason,
I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.

- James Baldwin, "Autobiographical Notes,"
Notes of a Native Son (1955)

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Niemoller Redux....

Those who cannot remember the past
are doomed to repeat it.

 - George Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905-1906)
Reason in Common Sense, Vol. 1

Earlier this year, just a week after the inauguration of a new American president, I wrote a piece entitled "Who are we and what have we become?"  The question is more urgent now.

That president has shown himself to be unworthy of the office repeatedly - and almost gleefully so - and yet there are those who defend his behavior staunchly.  The sad irony is that the vast majority of those who tend to defend - and, in truth really, excuse - him most fiercely are also those who are most disenfranchised by him and his 'policies.'

Who are we and what have we become, indeed.

Why, just this week, this 'president' gracelessly turned the Boy Scout Jamboree into a political rally - with an even less graceless summoning of a chant deriding his predecessor, no less - and we were shocked and saddened again (for what, like the 97th or 970th time?!?).  But he's an overachiever, this one, so he had to top that slide to a new bottom by banning our fellow transgender citizens from serving in the military.  (Yeah, because, you know, that's a major problem for our society, them transgenders runnin' up all those medical bills the military has to pay.)  And if all of this new crassness and cravenness weren't enough - and in case we weren't clear that there's no low to which he won't go - he ended the week by focusing on another sudden area of interest - in this case, Latino gangs on Long Island - by encouraging officers of the law to physically abuse suspects - yes, suspects, not convicts - which, even more damningly, drew significant cheers from the crowd of officers assembled.  WTF, America?!?  Seriously.

Who are we and what have we become, indeed.

Like so many of my generation, I was told the lie that I could grow up to be president one day, and I kinda believed it.  Not the part about actually becoming president - I am African-American after all - but the sentiment that I should seek to be a leader in my community, especially by contributing constructively to the welfare of our commonweal.  I naively subscribed to the notion that I could help America move ever closer to living its creeds, a nation in which we were judged, in the indelible words of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King's indelible phrase, by the content of our character and not the color of our skin (or, to put a modern addendum on this, whatever our 'difference(s)' may be).

And President Obama made me both proud and ashamed: proud that a literal African-American could ascend to the presidency in my lifetime and govern - truly lead - with such vision, grace and restraint ... and ashamed of myself for assuming that this was not possible and thus lowering my own sights to serve as well as ashamed of my country because of how we, collectively, treated this man.  Imagine the delusional hubris necessary for us to consider ourselves "post-racial" just for electing him.  Own the craven racism that we exhibited in ways both overt and covert for the next eight years.

But because positive change is inexorably followed by a regressive reaction, we have as our 'leader' - no, not a flawed but competent and committed public servant as the Leader of the Free World - this trainwreck of a human being - and many days I'm not sure about the 'human' part - who is the very embodiment of all of the -isms that continue to plague our country.  (I don't need to list 'em, right, the racism, sexism/misogyny, xenophobia, religiocentrism, etc.?)  To borrow the title of a damning reflection on our society a half-century ago, our president is truly The Ugly American ... and still some of our member revel in this.

Who are we and what have we become, indeed.

I am saddened to acknowledge this new, lesser reality about us: it was bad enough that we were horrible to a graceful leader who happened to be African-American, but the unshakable embrace of our current president - the very embodiment of all that I have raised my children and mentored thousands of young people not to be - by so many of our fellow citizens often leaves me bereft of late.  And then I remember that despondency will only increase my and our suffering and I am called - truly compelled - to resist.

And I start in this resistance by being grounded in history, including the piercing - and tragic - wisdom of the late Rev. Martin Niemoller.  A leader in the Confessing Church - a resistance movement that opposed the Nazi-controlled and -led German Lutheran Church during World War II - he observed a particularly damaging pattern of behavior among his countrymen, a troubling acquiescence to Evil.  In my view, it is the same acquiescence that we are displaying in our own country at this very moment.

An example from this past week:  Upon learning of 45's inhumane and ill-considered prohibition of transgender Americans from serving in the military, celebrity Caitlyn Jenner was outraged and tweeted in defiant response to the president's announcement.  Good for her ... except that the timing and her response were, shall we say to be kind, both tardy and self-concerned.  As acknowledged liberal commentator Allen Clifton noted about the situation:

It’s amazing, isn’t it?
Apparently, Jenner was fine when Trump:

  • Slandered Mexicans.
  • Vilified immigrants.
  • Pushed hate against Muslims.
  • Belittled POWs.
  • Attacked Gold Star parents.
  • Made sexist comments.
  • Mocked the appearance of Ted Cruz’s wife.
  • Fueled a campaign filled with so much hate, he inspired the KKK, white nationalists, and neo-Nazis to become more politically active than they’ve been in decades.

Despite all of that, Jenner still voted for Trump because none of his previous horrific behavior was really aimed at her or any sort of demographic to which she belongs. It wasn’t until he did something aimed at individuals like herself, transgender Americans, that she’s now speaking out against him.
See, that’s what drives me crazy about Republicans. They’re perfectly fine letting their politicians vilify or screw over other groups of people, just as long as that GOP ignorance doesn’t impact them.
So/too often now, we're fine with others being maimed by the inhumane and cynically erratic behavior of our president - and the craven sycophancy and hypocrisy of his (Republican) enablers in Congress - as long as it doesn't affect us directly (or, in reality for too many, as long as we don't realize that it affects us).  In sum, we've become selfish and mean.  Honestly, think on this for just a moment.  How's this going to work out, writ large across our society and the expanse of history?  And even if you think that you - and, by extension, your loved ones - will be OK, what about everyone else?

I'll end this piece with the original formulation of Rev. Niemoller's prophetic poetic wisdom (which differs slightly from the most popular versions of it, known by the title of "First They Came...", but is no less poignant and damning), delivered early in the War when it had become clear just how expansive the scope of the evil vision of the Third Reich was:

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I was silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

What's good for Johnny is good for America....

To be a Negro in this country
and to be relatively conscious
is to be in a rage almost all the time.
So that the first problem
is how to control that rage
so that it won't destroy you.

 - James Baldwin, "The Negro in American Culture" (1961)


John - not his real name - is my friend, of whom I and his other family and friends are greatly proud, as should we all be.  He's the very embodiment of how we'd like to see ourselves as a society and as a country: from modest middle class beginnings, he's fashioned a successful and accomplished life for himself and his family in his adulthood.  He's played by the rules, kept his nose to the grindstone and worked hard as we were all taught to do.  Accordingly, he is a man to be admired and cited as an inspiration to us all and especially to our children.  And yet this is how he feels about his American Experience of the moment:

I spent much of yesterday in reflection, trying to put into words what I was feeling. While I could attribute a good portion of what I felt to the elevation of a man whom I've detested for much of my adult life - with good reason - there was something else. My antipathy towards that man masked another, deeper, set of feelings. It wasn't anger. Sure, the anger was there but I wanted to know what those other feelings were - the ones that I couldn't put my finger on.
Then it hit me. I remembered back to 5-6 years after I graduated from college. I was at a business event, for young Black professionals, where I heard a senior Black executive speak. Afterwards, I got a chance to chat with this man and we exchanged cards. I was thrilled, a few weeks later, when his office called and said that he'd like for me to join him for lunch. Over the span of 4-5 months, our relationship built as we had a number of discussions over the phone and in person. I grew to greatly admire and respect this man. As I had not had a business mentor who looked like me, this meant a lot. One day, he suggested that my fiancée (soon to be my wife) and I join him for dinner. On the way, we excitedly talked about the possibility that this man was going to make me a job offer. After all, my recent conversations with him were peppered with him telling me that "greater things were in store" for me, and that I wasn't "maximizing my talents" with my current employer.
It turns out that "dinner" was, actually, an MLM recruitment event. His "taking me under his wing" was an elaborate ploy to recruit me to sell soap and water purifiers and cosmetics. Later on, I heard that this was his M.O. He sized up "recruits" at networking events and developed a mentor relationship before asking them to join his team. It was the classic "long con". I was crushed and hurt to learn that someone whom I greatly admired, and respected, was someone dramatically different from what I thought he was. I never spoke with him again.
That was it. This was how I was feeling now. I'm hurt and disappointed to know that "my country" would elect a man, to the highest office in the land, who is vulgar and mean and racist and misogynistic and mendacious and ignorant and homophobic and insecure. And there is no question that he is these things - even those who voted for him would, mostly, agree. While I knew that the country was hardly "post racial", I thought we were better. I never in a million years thought that my country would actually elect someone like this man. A man who had been a NYC punchline for decades. A clown. A poor person's warped imagining of a rich person. Richie Rich wrapped up in Arthur wrapped up in the Monopoly Man.
So while I have hope for resistance, and while I believe that this resistance will usher in a new era of unity among those who will be oppressed under this "regime" (because that is, exactly, what it is), I am sad to have found out that the country I was so proud of for electing President Barack H. Obama, was actually setting me up for one of the the biggest disappointments of my life.

"Johnny," as he's called lovingly by his friends, has, by all measures, made it in modern America.  So why is he so disaffected?  My own view is that, in small part, this is due to his distress over the seemingly deep division in our commonweal.  This being said, however, I would argue that a far larger spur for his disaffection is that he is - and always will be - Black in America.  And to make it plain, as the old folks used to say, there's nothin' quite like - or as painful - as bein' Black in America....

I can empathize with Johnny's plight and with his feelings about our native land ... but I'm from Detroit, so despite my late but very proper southern mother's best efforts otherwise - sorry, Mom! - I am want to digress from eloquence into fierce frankness from time to time, so here goes....

What Johnny and I and many others, especially People of Color, are feeling is, simply put, betrayed.  Betrayed because we were lied to as kids (though, I'm sure, with the best of intentions on the part of those adults who nurtured us).  Betrayed because though we joined the mainstream and, by all accounts, played the game well, the outcomes and experience thereof has been meaningfully different - which is a really nice way of saying "lesser" - for us (despite the reality that many of us have done some amazing things and occupied lofty perches).  One need only think of President Obama - that elegant, graceful and disciplined man/soul - and how he was treated to understand what I'm suggesting.  Funny how you can become President of the United States - the ultimate accomplishment to which we were pointed as children - and still be disrespected largely due to immutable factors over which you have no control.  But I digress too eloquently....

And in light of the most recent developments in which our fellow citizens have elected a man who is the very embodiment of the -isms that still hold our country back as well as the very antithesis of all we were raised to be, in addition to feeling betrayed, we also feel palpably, sometimes uncontrollably, angry.

To put a finer point on it (and personalize it), pillar of the community though I may appear to be, our national social and political retrenchment, the continuing problems of societal inhumanity that have occasioned the need for a movement to coalesce under the moniker Black Lives Matter and the realization that so much progress is likely to be undone by the stroke of a presidential pen and a flurry of legislative activity from a formerly moribund and morally blind Congress is converging to make me that which (white) America fears most: the proverbial Angry Black Man.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I still dress well and go to work and play nice in the mainstream sandbox, but when I return to my home, my sanctuary, my anger is safe to come out.  And it does, virtually every day.  Lately it seems as if not a day goes by in which we learn of some new and tragic injustice, typically related to the victim's skin color (or some other immutable factor) and not the content of his or her character.

But perhaps I should be more careful with my words so that my meaning and message can be clearer: I am first and foremost outraged, which is what leads to my anger.  (Of course, the latter must be largely privately expressed, as public expressions thereof have consistently been met with brutal - and sometimes lethal - repression over the course of the history of our country.)

Outraged because a racist, sexist, misogynistic, xenophobic, homophobic, et. al., sexual predator has been elected the Leader of the Free World (as if other countries don't have enough reasons to be mad at us already).  Outraged that the utterly fraudulent class warfare that's been going on for more than a generation has marked itself so powerfully as well as likely so impermeable to redress, which has been confounded by 'the people' who are most being disenfranchised voting for it out of ignorance, fear and, most sadly, supposed faith.  Outraged that more than a half-century after the landmark Civil and Voting Rights Acts were passed, the consistent assault on and effective repeal of those rights proceeds apace, all while those who're doing the assaulting and repealing feign a lack of awareness with paternalistic unconcern.  Outraged that, in their young adulthood, my children are inheriting a world that is in many ways, far more f@#ked up than the one that my/our generation inherited and that we were supposed to improve far more than we apparently have.

Also let me be clear about this:  Yes, I am furiously angry because of my experience as a Black Man in America, my race and that of tens of millions of other People of Color continuing to have an outsized negative impact on our lives and especially those of our children ... but more than this, I am absolutely incensed because what's happening is an unconscionable affront to my and our humanity.  In this modern era, never before have we been so materially wealthy and yet so morally bankrupt.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I, too, have read MLK's later works in which his optimism had faded and his expressions of disappointment and outraged anger had multiplied, so I know that this country has been this way for some time.  But our assumption of progress - that uniquely naive American inheritance born of ignorance and arrogance - has proven misguided, at least in our lifetime.  If Dr. King is correct that the arc of the moral universe is long and bends toward justice, either its timeframe is far more elongated than we think or the unspoken caveat to this wisdom/insight is that progress is not linear but happens in fits and starts necessitating constant vigilance and continual action and advocacy.  But, again, I digress too eloquently....

What's most ironic to me in this new era of ours is that we're so deeply divided when, in actuality, I believe that we all agree on one thing: that our beloved America is on the wrong path.  The challenge that we face is a disagreement over the direction in which we should proceed going forward.  On the one side are those who hope to return to a bygone era (or, at least, a claimed one that has also been ascribed to history); on the other are those who believe, based on observation and experience, that history only moves forward and thus so should we.  Suffice it to say that I find myself (far) more persuaded by the latter than the former.

Simply put, there's no society on Earth that's been able to return to a golden era of a previous incarnation, though a few have tried to replicate them, most often with uneven results (to be kind).

What's far more prevalent in the historical record is that history marches on, often in unexpected directions, and thus people individually and societies collectively have to re-imagine their path creatively.  As numerous sages have pointed out over the years, the only certainty is that circumstances will change ... and our job is to be adaptable enough to roll with them and thrive in the successive new realities with which they present us.

So, too, I believe is the present case: not only because it's a fiction to which we can't return but also because of the forward historical imperative, Making American Great Again is not about going back to some mythical time but forward to a different and better reality than the one that we enjoy currently.

But change is hard, especially when power shifts accompany it.  In this case, America is becoming less white, less Christian and less supportive of the myriad -isms that have plagued our society since its inception.  But for many white, self-considered Christians prone to fear and thus to demonize The Other, a more diverse America in which they have to share power - or, God forbid, be in the minority - is not of interest.

In fact, it's to be resisted at virtually all costs.  How else can one explain the support of white Christians for a president who's behavior demonstrates virtually no familiarity with Christian principles whatsoever and whose economic policies disenfranchise them in ways that are likely to be long-lasting if not permanent?  How else can one explain the belief that "America first" trade policies will stem the decades-long tide of globalization and return high wage jobs to this country (even as that very same president's companies make all of their products sold in this country overseas because the wages in this country are [still/already] too high [or, more correctly, will reduce profit margins too much])?  How else can one explain a mystifying belief that the problem with our society is immigrants, the vast majority of whom are law abiding - more so than those white Christians, in fact - and who do jobs that white Christians long ago eschewed doing?  (If you doubt this last point, just google Alabama and North Carolina and their recent [disastrous] approaches to expulsion of immigrant agricultural workers to see just how far-fetched such a theory would have to be.)  How else ... well, you get the picture....

Let's face it, like the Afrikaners before them, white Christian Americans are worried about what happens when they no longer dominate this society ... and, truth be told, for good reason.  American history, whitewashed though it is, is replete with egregious examples of white Christian inhumanity, so the fear of payback is a most legitimate one ... except, again, for the reality of historical example, which shows, for instance, that there was no widespread retribution in the Republic of South Africa.

Again, I digress too eloquently....

So, to sum this up and keep it real/100, let's just put it this way:  America has been great throughout much of its history - let's acknowledge this - but only for some and decidedly not for all.  For far too many of us, we need to Make America Great for the First Time by holding it accountable to its professed creeds.  In so doing, we must fashion a world in which all of God's children of whatever hue, gender identity, religion, etc., can drink from the deep Well of Opportunity that this country can represent.  But until that day, we should all realize that the anger of the dispossessed exists on both sides of our ideological divide and that if this is not addressed deftly, the fabric of our society may tear irreparably.

So how do we keep this from happening, to prevent us from tearing ourselves apart forever?  There are many ways, but I'll focus on just a few:

First, let's commit to living by the Platinum Rule.  Beyond just treating each other as we ourselves would like to be treated - which is an egocentric, sub-optimal approach - let's commit to treating each other as these others want to be treated.  Among other things, this imposes a duty upon us to get to know each other well so that we can predict how our fellows want to be treated.  This may seem a huge leap - and it is - but it's solely in a forward direction.

Second, let's commit to respecting each other's religious beliefs and yet keeping them out of the public square.  I really don't care which of the paths to God you favor - or if you don't favor one at all - but I would like not to have you claim God's mantle to disadvantage me, which is how institutional religion - and especially institutional conservative Christianity - plays out in American society currently.  So, I'm glad your faith - or lack thereof - sustains you, but please stop trying to reflect your evangelism in the contours of the society in which I'm supposed to enjoy my freedom.

Third, let's commit to the commonweal, meaning that we'll be guided in our policy- and decision-making by the Greater Good.  Adverse impacts are real and too well targeted in our history, so we must acknowledge and address them if we are to go forward differently and better in the future.  And as we craft the ever evolving rules by which we interact and progress, let's be fair and equitable in our construction.  To an appreciable extent, this is a commitment to multi-faceted diversity and inclusion in that we want all of God's children to have a chance in life and to have access to opportunities that can enable individual and collective progress.  And this does mean all of God's children....

And fourth and finally, let's commit to reality and truth over mendacity and b.s.  Let's face it, the lies that we allow to be told in our society at present are fantastic and fantastically awful in that they limit our ability to make progress toward a more just and equitable society.  As hard as it may be, let's admit and address all of the -isms that still plague us by opening the doors of opportunity more broadly and by being vigilant in holding our elected representatives to this 'truth and reality, no b.s.' standard.  I realize that this is asking a lot of us - more, in fact, than we've ever asked of ourselves before - but our future depends on it.  Simply put, you can't build a strong foundation for the future on a fantastical cornerstone.  It, like our consciences, really must be able to bear the weight....

If we choose to disregard these suggestions - and many astutely developed ones that others have offered - then we do so at our increasing peril.  This tailspin of societal devolution that we're experiencing will only get worse unless we correct course soon and significantly.  The only remaining question is whether or not we have the will to do so, as the consequences of failure become clearer and more precipitous each day.

Bringing this meditation back to where it started, remember that Johnny is a winner in this game and yet largely disaffected.  Just imagine what happens when others like him join forces with those who are losing increasingly in our current societal structure.  History offers precedents for this, too: seems to me there was a revolution in this very country in the late eighteenth century when it was widely perceived that the structure of our society was oppressive.

To put it bluntly, unless we move in a different and better direction - one in which the Johnnys of our society are likely to go from angry to fiercely proud - then we will indeed experience the traumatic pain of failing to learn from history - our own, no less - and find to our horror that everything old indeed can be new again but not in a great way....


God gave Noah the rainbow sign,
No more water the fire next time.

 - Negro Spiritual "Mary Don't You Weep"


Saturday, May 6, 2017

The Gift of Donald Trump: A Study in Black and White....

In a real sense all life is inter-related.
All men are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality,
tied in a single garment of destiny.
Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.
I can never be what I ought to be
until you are what you ought to be,
and you can never be what you ought to be
until I am what I ought to be....
This is the inter-related structure of reality.

- The Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
"Letter From Birmingham Jail" (1963)


Let's be clear from the start: Donald Trump is a blight on the American Presidency and on the country as a whole.  But he's also a gift ... perhaps one that we don't want or think that we don't need, but a gift nonetheless.  Here's why:

Donald Trump has committed to and is achieving an historic level of equality in our county: deeply and unashamedly faithful to the Plutocracy of which he is a part, he and his minions are f@#cking over everyone else, including the regular white folks who voted for him.  In sum, you either have - in which case his policies don't affect you much if at all except to help you - or you don't - in which case there'll be hell to pay, apparently on an equal opportunity basis....

The winning, it seems, is limited to those who've already won in life ... and they don't appear to be getting tired of winning any time soon....

Plutocrats don't live near streams that can again be polluted with toxic chemicals (including because they own the polluting entities and are again legally insulated from the impact of them now).  Plutocrats don't have kids in public schools, so they don't care about whether your children are shamed at lunch for being unable to afford it or whether they're in classrooms with too many students led by underpaid (but usually dedicated) teachers or whether they're not being sufficiently educated for the 21st century (in which a high school diploma offers few if any societal benefits) or whether you're trying hard to use your voucher to get your kid into one of the charter schools or private (often religious) academies that may soon be allowed to take public school funds.  Plutocrats' kids don't have student loans that can again be collected in predatory ways.  Plutocrats don't need public health insurance.  (Because they can afford private concierge medical care.  Try it sometime if you can afford it: empty lounge rooms with no extended waiting, doctors with premium pedigrees who have ample time so serve patients, etc., kinda like a medical DisneyWorld with nothin' but Fast Passes.)  Plutocrats ... well, you get the picture....

By contrast, lower and middle American racists - and, stop the sanctimonious b.s. 'cause too many of 'em supported Mr. Trump specifically because he was so unafraid to be racist, sexist, misogynistic, xenophobic, ignorant, arrogant, etc. - need all of these protections and now will be without them.  Hmmm.  And yet few of them seem either smart enough to realize their mistake or humble enough to admit it ... yet.

Let's face it, middle America, you voted for a Plutocrat who gamed the System to get rich and stay that way who you somehow came to believe would tear down that very system to let in you and your kind.  Except that he'd never done anything of the sort ever in his entire adult life to indicate that your hope had a basis in reality.  What he promised you was that America would be great again, which you took to mean that other white folks like you would be in charge again.  Except that they're not like you and don't care about you as their actions from day one of this travesty/abomination of an Administration demonstrate.  Yes, you may be white ... but you're middle class or poor and the only white that counts in 45's America is Rich White (with a side of Powerful White).

If you don't believe me, think about this: how many of you were in two iconic recent photographs, the one of the lily-white Capitol Hill staff and interns or the one of the (morally reprehensible and premature) Rose Garden celebration for the passage of the AHCA?  None?  But maybe your kids could be in them someday?  Perhaps ... except that everything that this Administration has done and will do will pull that proverbial mobility ladder up as they rise.

Don't you get it yet?  What's it going to take to make you realize that you got completely conned by a man who pandered to your basest instincts in exchange for the opportunity to make sure that you and all the other little people who want things from the government won't get them because the government's gonna be broke from paying for the tax cuts that lighten his and his fellow Plutocrats' financial burden?!?

Don't you yet get the AHCA?  It's a tax cut for rich people cloaked in the language of healthcare reform for you ... meaning that the rich folks will get the money that otherwise would have paid for your healthcare.  Do you doubt this?  Check out the estimates of the size of the tax cut disproportionately for the wealthy (approx. $1 Trillion according to Fox News or 'only' $675 Billion according to NPR - pick your source) and the cuts to Medicaid (approx. $880 Billion according to the Atlantic Magazine or those commie bastards in the Congressional Budget Office - again, pick your source).  Notice the similarity?  The rich will get richer and stay healthy enough to create more jobs for the lumpenproletariat who already have the least access to life-sustaining healthcare and apparently better start praying that they don't get too sick soon because they'll be without it (again).  And all of you regular folks who're already sick, well, it's been nice knowing you because your (pre-)existing condition makes you ineligible for coverage in Trumpworld.

(Can't help but hear the words of the Marcan and Matthean Jesus when I think of this: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"  [Mark 15:34, Matthew 27:46]  Because our society has elected leaders who've favored themselves and their kind and truly and totally forsaken We the People!?!

And I'm so disgusted and dismayed over it now as I write that I must move on....)  

As I suggested in a previous post - "Who Are We? And What Have We Become?" (January 28th, 2017) - I actually agree with Mr. Trump on one point: we do, in fact, need to make America great again ... but we diverge as to how.  Whereas 45 and his minions seek to divide, demean and disaffirm life, by contrast, I believe that we must unite, uphold, celebrate and affirm our common humanity.  Among other things, this means that we must...
  • Make America kind again, a country that seeks to help all of its citizens to live a better life (if not really pursue the American Dream) rather than demonizing those who find themselves out of power at any given time or, for too many of our fellows, seemingly permanently
  • Make America thoughtful again, so that our leaders - returning to being reality-based rather than partisan-deranged - are actually mindful of the long-term interests of the many constituencies they serve and are accordingly carefully responsive.
  • Make America communal again, a place where we realize that our success is tied to our neighbors' and where we act on the truths that MLK taught us, including that we are all woven together in a single garment of destiny and that if we don't learn to live together as brothers and sisters we'll certainly perish as fools.
  • Make America conversant again, a society in which we don't always agree but within which we can and do participate in a multi-faceted conversation as we listen to others and their perspectives, educate each other and seek to fashion solutions to our problems that benefit the many rather than the few.
  • Make America open and embracing again, a country in which we realize that we're all immigrants, which means that we're all different yet have something to contribute, our diversity being our greatest strength, and in which every man, woman and child is our brother or sister rather than The Other.
And there are so many more ways that we can join together to make a better country and, indeed, world.  Or we can choose the path of division and death proffered by this Administration.  The contrast is clear: its policies disproportionately favor the rich over the middle class or poor (and, in many if not most cases, actually disenfranchise the latter) and its embrace of a "healthcare" actually means that there will be less of it and many more people will die (needlessly).

How stark does this difference have to become for us to make a different choice?

Let me offer a suggestion that may help increase your acuity:  Try being Black or of Color for a while.  Yep, try being Black Like Me as John Howard Griffin did more than a half-century ago.  Then you'll see the difference in stark relief ... and then, too, you'll realize that your brand of white - the middle class and/or poor one - doesn't offer you much in Trumpworld: yes, you're still white, so you'll still be at the top ... but it's the top of the bottom and the real top is getting higher and higher which means further and further away for you and your progeny, so much so as not really to be attainable anymore.

Face it, you're now stuck down here with the rest of us, fighting for the crumbs from our Plutocrat masters' table.  Yes, equality has come anew to America: the masses are virtually equally disadvantaged and the rich are insulated and unperturbed.  America as a Banana Republic: not the America I consider great.  What about you?

So if you want a different and better America, band with those who are like you except for the color of their skin or their gender or their sexual orientation or their religion or their country of origin or their whatever and fight to make America a country committed to its ideals again.  Demand that those who represent you reflect our founding ethos in their behavior (and not just empty rhetoric).  Indeed, Make America Great Again ... by making it truly America for all for the first time....

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
- The Preamble to the Constitution of these United States

Saturday, March 25, 2017

The Radicalization of Walter K. Booker (and why I'm OK with it...)

Radical simply means 'grasping things at the root.'

- Dr. Angela Davis


Lately I've heard numerous 'news' stories describe the "radicalization" of various religious zealots as a rationale for why they commit atrocities.  Like most, I suppose, I tend to judge them with a knowing (and, truthfully, condescending) "tsk, tsk" and then say a short prayer for their victims before moving on with my comfortable life.  And then one day I realized that I've been radicalized, too....

Increasingly at mid-life, I find that my thinking - and, I hope, very being - is far more radical than in my youth in many ways.  For example, I now consider myself a...
  • Radical Feminist
  • Radical Humanist
  • Radical Life-ist

What's a Radical Feminist, you ask?  Well, in my (developing) formulation, it's a person who no longer believes in any limitations placed on those of the female gender voluntarily (which differentiates these from the natural [and legitimate-to-consider] physical ones).  I am against patriarchy in all of its forms, which is a really hard position to hold as the ostensible patriarch of my little clan ... but then my wife is my partner and equal in every way (and, truth be told, my better in most ways), so I'm not really the patriarch, am I, really?

(Reminds me of a time in my youth when my late, sainted mother suggested that I go ask my father to bless a purchase that she had already made on my behalf.  When I asked her why I should seek agreement on something that had already been done, she noted that it was important to let my father feel that he was involved and in charge.  Sure enough, my dad gave his blessing and then all was well ... except that I felt sad for the King as he sat on his throne in our den thinking that he actually knew what was going on and was presiding over it....)

That it will be novel to have our first-ever female president eventually strikes me as both sad and absurd in the 21st century.  Simply out, we must get beyond gender (in the sense of it being a restricting factor) as it warps  our shared reality and encourages self-limiting choices that are, on the whole, negative for us as a human race....

(And don't get me started about the absurdity and profanity of how too many of us treat our fellows in the LGBTQ community: suffice it to say that whoever you are and however you identify is your choice, reflective of the unique humanity with which you've been gifted ... and anyone who seeks to deny this for any reason - religious or otherwise - is an inhuman ass.  Your being LGBTQ or whatever doesn't affect who I choose to be in any way, so for me or anyone else to pretend that it does is just fundamentally dishonest and inhumane.  Be who you are on this one short trip of life that we get - and share - and know that whoever that turns out to be, I'm happy for and supportive and celebratory of you!)

And what's a Radical Humanist?  Well, in this still-developing formulation, I'm moving beyond the religious differences that we've chosen to divide us and focusing on what I consider to be the ultimate reality of our lives: that we are all equally human - which, to me, as a believer, means that we are all Children of God - and thus we are all deserving of having that humanity affirmed, supported and celebrated always.  I don't care if you're a Christian or a Jew or a Muslim or a Sikh or an atheist, you're a human being and I believe that you deserve to be both allowed and encouraged to be who you are and that your uniqueness should be celebrated by us all.  None of us is better than any other of us, but we are legitimately different and these differences should be recognized, appreciated, explored and celebrated.

Hence, as a Radical Humanist, I'm also a fervent believer in and practitioner of Diversity & Inclusion.  It's pretty clear to me that the profound diversity in the natural world suggests that God (= He/She/It) is a believer in the power of uniqueness, otherwise why would we have so many different plants, animals, people, etc.?  Following on this, then, it's incumbent upon us to appreciate this idiosyncracy and try to leverage it for our mutual/collective benefit.

(Which is where I bring back in the concept of gender and, by example, suggest that it should be gotten beyond as a limiter in our thinking and experience but be absolutely and appropriately celebrated to the extent that being female is a very different and wonderful experience of our humanity.)

Or, put more positively, it's incumbent upon us to celebrate and learn more about our differences, not be scared by and 'Otherize' because of them.  Of course, let's acknowledge that this respectful exploration takes work, which is why so many decry so-called political correctness now: it's really an admission that they'd prefer that you respect what's different and good about them without them having to make the effort to do the same with respect to you.  Last I checked, successful, long-term relationships all seem to require abiding by the Law of Mutual Benefit, so any effort to shirk one's responsibility to understand as much as to be understood isn't likely to work well....

Another aspect of my Radical Humanism is my evolving and increasingly fierce embrace of ecology and acceptance of my individual and our collective responsibility to appreciate, respect, honor and cultivate this one sacred place that we've been given to live.  Anything that degrades or demeans Mother Earth is just as inappropriate and harmful as anything that does so with respect to any of its inhabitants (including the animals whom we tend to consider as lessers because we've been taught to presume that they don't have souls and thus are supposed to be ruled, for some reason, by those of us who claim to have them ...).

In sum, my Radical Humanism leads me to feel compelled to celebrate this One Life that we share - and/with all of God's Creatures and Children who share it - which is why I consider myself to be a(n evolving) Radical Life-ist, too.  (Yeah, I know, I need a better term for this; feel free to offer suggestions!)

What this means is simple: that in every moment of my existence and with every gift that I have been given and/or developed and in any and every way, I am compelled to affirm my own and others' uniqueness and right to exist and contribute and therefore that I am compelled to get beyond my comfort zone, reach out to those who may be different (but certainly in no way lesser) than me and to do the admittedly often challenging work of getting to know, affirming, supporting and celebrating their uniqueness and right to exist, too.

In the words of the insightful and inspiring Bishop John Shelby Spong, as a Radical Life-ist, I'm called to live fully, love wastefully and be all that I can be ... and, in so doing, to affirm, support and celebrate each and every one of God's other creatures in doing the same.

Not surprisingly, then, I find so much of our world repugnant and disheartening.  Our politics in America are toxic and mystifying: so many of us claim to be Christians and yet support policies that are the very antithesis of our Patron's example.  Our new Administration is an abomination in so many ways, including its appalling tendency to divide and diminish the humanity that it's supposed to serve while enabling the poisoning of our communities, the choice of commerce over citizens, the continuing disenfranchisement from voting rights and healthcare options, etc.  And then there's the ugliness in the rest of the world....

It hurts.  A lot.  (And, sometimes, too much.)

And yet I remain hopeful because there is a "still more excellent way," that of Radicalism.  Not only is being a Radical a more edifying way to live - to cite just a single example, the letting go of the impulse to hate and to fear and to inhumanity is so incredibly freeing - but it offers the opportunity to 'flip the script': instead of focusing on what's bad or wrong, we can revel in the myriad instances of what's beautiful, of what's right, of what's affirming, of what's supportive, of what's celebratory, etc., that occur in virtually every moment of every day and then build on them.

No, I'm not a pie-in-the-sky optimist or utopian, just a reality-based Radical.  Our choices are as clear as they are stark: we can contribute to the ugliness in our world and kill ourselves from the inside out or focus narrowly on ourselves and our own interests and accept our own gradual withering away morally and otherwise or we can engage lovingly with life and our fellow Children and Creatures of God and keep doing the bravest thing possible: joining hands with those who share this journey in time and keep putting one foot in front of the other toward a better and more humane existence.

As I've aged - and possibly matured - more and more I've moved from that middle, selfish choice to the radical third one and, in so doing, have experienced more of the beauty - and heartache - of life.  But, I've also experienced something unexpected: a profound, fundamental and animating joy that comes from living fully, loving wastefully and trying hard and failing every day at being all that I can be.

And, so, dear friends, I share my journey with you and invite you, too, to become a Radical....


So when I try to make sense of what I believe is my experience of the transcendent,
I use three concepts.
I experience God as “the Source of life” empowering me to“live fully.”
I experience God as “the Source of love” freeing me to “love wastefully,”
by which I mean to love without stopping to count the cost;
without pausing to determine whether the recipient of that love is an appropriate recipient.
I experience God as “the Ground of all Being,” who gives me the courage to be all that I can be.
If that is what God means to me then I worship this God by
“living fully, loving wastefully and being all that I am capable of being.”
My mission as a Christian is not “to convert the heathen” as we once asserted,
it is rather to assist in the task of helping all people
“to live fully, to love wastefully and to be all that they are capable of being.”
This is a Christianity grounded in a radical understanding of humanity.

- Bishop John Shelby Spong

Sunday, March 12, 2017

Not in spite of, but because of....

In our interconnected world, we must learn to feel
enlarged, not threatened, by difference....
 - Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks


One of the sweeter ironies of my adult life is that I now voluntarily attend church more often than my sainted mother and far more than I grudgingly did as a teenager being lugged there by her oh so many years ago.  I go to feed my soul, to share in a community of spiritually-minded fellow human beings and to nurture - and, most often, restore - the innate sense of hope that I treasure but so often feels besieged by life of late.

And today's service was one of those spiritual gifts that brings me back to the sanctuary at least three weeks out of every four now.  We had a guest preacher, the Rev. Dr. Sonia E. Waters, a professor at Princeton Theological Seminary who just happens to be the Much Better Half of my dear friend and priest, the Rev. John A. Mennell.  (Like me, he's married way up, a gift for which we are both thankful and that we revel in often.)  She taught - and I do mean taught, even as she preached - a sermon on the Samaritan Woman by the Well in the Gospel of John.  And it'll go down in my all-time top 10 sermons.  Here's why: simply put, Rev. Waters (or Sonia, as she seems to prefer being called), flipped the script in such a paradigm-shifting way that it left an indelible mark and was one of those 'a-ha!' moments that rocks you in the present and lingers long and lastingly thereafter....

For those of you unfamiliar with the story of the Samaritan Woman by the Well as portrayed in the fourth chapter of John's Gospel, let's just say that it features a highly unusual interaction, in this case between Jesus and an unnamed stranger of a different gender ... and, thanks to Rev. Waters' illumination, I will never quite conceive of it - and, more importantly, its much deeper meaning - in the same way ever again.

[Rev. Waters' treatment was such a paradigm shift that it reminded me of others in my spiritual history spurred by the likes of Bishop John A.T. Robinson, theologians Paul Tillich and Reinhold Niebuhr, Bishop John Spong, Rev. Mennell - yeah, her husband's contributed a few over the years, too (which must be yet another thing that they have in common) - and the Rev. Dr. Obery Hendricks.  For example, the latter's exposition of the Lord's Prayer in his extraordinary The Politics of Jesus has so indelibly marked me spiritually that I have always conceived of this seminal prayer differently and more powerfully and resonantly ever since.  So, too, I suspect will I now see the Woman by the Well.]

In reviewing the context of the meeting and subsequent discussion between the protagonists of this story, Rev. Waters noted that it was unusual in antiquity for a Jew and a Samaritan to discourse (which we've mostly forgotten is the context of the biblical parable of the Good Samaritan) as well as for a man to speak to an unaccompanied woman.  So unusual, in fact, that the Disciples tried to dissuade Jesus from having it.  But He persisted.  And what follows was such a powerful moment, born of the interaction of strangers, that the woman was converted as were many of her neighbors when she shared her testimony thereafter.  

Further, the well is a familiar setting in biblical history, where many a woman met a man who changed her life.  More broadly, Rev. Waters noted, the well was a crossroads where different people met in the ancient world because they all had a common need, for water.

And this is the kernel from which she extracted a powerful testimony and lesson: that we are all different but share a common humanity and therein lies an opportunity to live into God.

But difference scares us, so we have a tendency to 'Otherize.'  As Rev. Waters described it, "It's our human nature to erase difference," which leads us to want to seek likeness and reject variety.  When faced with the opportunity to open ourselves to some who's different - be it a difference rooted in race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc. - we have choice, to be loving or to give into our fear, distance ourselves and virtually always demonize or in some way demean/deem the Other as lesser.

And yet those of us who claim to follow a person who always chose love too often choose fear....

But, as Rev. Sonia noted, Jesus chose the Woman by the Well because she was different: it was her difference that offered the possibility to bridge a gap in ancient culture and belief.  She pointed out that "Jesus doesn't (try to) fix her," but knows her and accepts her as she is, despite her difficult history.  She continued that "What Jesus is saying here is that shame is a useless emotion at the crossroads of God's Knowledge (of) and Love (for us)."  In fact, she pointed out, "differences are the exact things that can change us."  It's in our Otherness relative to each other that we can learn to live into God's love ... and thus we are called by God "not in spite of (our differences) but because of" them.  We all have difficult life histories - yet another thing that we share as human beings - and thus in these gifts of varied experience we find that "God has equipped (us) in the crucible of (our) own lives to be a vessel of Living Water," a living embodiment of His/Her/Its Love.

Hmmm....

As I sat and listened to Rev. Sonia speaking softly but passionately, I was jolted in one of those spiritual paradigm shifts that I've experienced over the course of my life: in fact, it's our difference that's the gift, even though we prefer similarity.  It's our difference that offers us the choice to fear and revile or to love and embrace.  It's our difference that makes us fallibly human and fearful or divinely human(/humane) and loving.  It's our difference that's why we're called to love as God loves, without respect to difference.  It's our difference that makes us the same, all and to a person, Children of God and vessels of Living Water ... if we choose to be.

So what will it be for you today?  Will you fear and avoid (and possibly demean) the Other?  Or will you embrace his/her/their Otherness as an opportunity to practice what Jesus preached by example in His life: love for all?

It's up to you.  And me.  But rest assured that God is calling us.  The question is how will we answer?  Will we choose fear or love?  Will we shrink from opportunity and separate ourselves to our mutual detriment or will we realize our full potential, be all that we can be, engage fully and love wastefully (as Bishop Spong suggests, based on Jesus' example)?

Today, thanks to Rev. Sonia, I now realize that our differences are our gifts and that we are called because of them.  Therein lies opportunity, specifically the opportunity to choose between fear and love.  And, following Rev. Dr. Hendricks' suggested moniker, as a self-considered Follower of Jesus, I'm committed to choosing love, as challenging and scary and messy as that may be at times.  Difference, the natural variety that Darwin noted so long ago, isn't a barrier but an invitation if we choose it.  And if I'm really going to follow Jesus, it means, just as He did with the Woman by the Well, I'll choose to love....


I give you a new commandment, that you love one another.
Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another.
By this everyone will know that you are my disciples,
if you have love for one another.

- Jesus Christ, as quoted in
The Gospel of St. John, 13:34-35